Million homeless in floods 16 seconds: Fewer dead in bridge disaster 3m 18s
By Andrew Grant-Adamson • Aug 4th, 2007 • Category: Broadcasting, JournalismBefore my previous post on the coverage of Foot and Mouth disease I had decided I wanted to question the BBC’s judgment on the 10 o’clock TV news last night. The floods in Nepal, Bangladesh and India which have left a million people homeless and at least 120 dead in Bangladesh and 55 in India got 16 seconds. The follow-up on the collapse of a bridge in Minneapolis which had killed fewer people than reported the previous night was given 3 minutes 18 seconds immediately following the flood story. (Watch again, before the next 10 o’clock news)
The explanation for this disproportion can only be the BBC’s heavy investment in US news coverage, having sent a staffman to Minneapolis and the familiarity of news executives with North America.
Proximity is hardly an issue: Minneapolis is 4,000 miles away while the distance from London to Kathmandu is 4,500 miles. And more viewers in the UK originate from or have family links to sub-continent than have similar links to North America. There is plenty of film available from the Indian sub-continent.
Andrew Grant-Adamson is Andrew Grant-Adamson is a journalist who now teaches a new generation of writers, subs and editors at the University of Westminster.
Email this author | All posts by Andrew Grant-Adamson
[...] alongside rival newspaper sites. Is this a sign that the Indy is finally warming to the web?Balanced coverage?Andrew Grant-Adamson points out the BBC’s strange priorites. The 10 O’clock news on Friday devoted [...]
[...] Wordblog: Million homeless in floods 16 seconds: Fewer dead in bridge disaster 3m 18s BBC’s judgment on the 10 o’clock News: Floods in Asia leave 1m homeless and at least 175 dead (16 seconds). Reduced deaths in Minneapolis bridge collapse follow-up (3 minutes 18 seconds). (tags: journalism bbc) [...]